Visibility internal Owner _ Approver _ Created _ Updated _
onb_general.json
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Type | JSON |
| Source | Product/Projects/Onboarding_Quiz/Output/onb_general.json |
| Parent | Product |
| GitHub | Product/Projects/Onboarding_Quiz/Output/onb_general.json |
This page is auto-generated. Edit the source to change the content.
{
"group": "uvilo_onb",
"slug": "uvilo_onb_general_001",
"handle": "onb_general",
"version": 1,
"date": "2026-03-03",
"name": "Onboarding: getting to know you",
"icon": "dharmachakra",
"image": "Illustrations/Ekaterina/dharmachakra_female",
"description": "Twenty-three questions. No right answers. You answer fast, we’ll read between the lines.",
"instructions": "This isn’t a test. You can’t study for it, you can’t fail it, and overthinking will only slow you down.\n\nGo with your gut. The answer that shows up in the first three seconds is the one we want. This won’t take long. Welcome aboard!",
"analysisBotHandle": "analyze-onboarding-quiz",
"randomizeAnswers": true,
"sections": [
{
"name": "Getting to know you",
"handle": "onboarding",
"questions": [
{
"handle": "onb_general_probe_sleep",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"question": "It’s 11 PM on a Tuesday. What’s actually happening?",
"evalHint": "Probes sleep hygiene and wind-down routines. The ‘already asleep’ option signals strong, established sleep architecture. ‘Winding down’ shows intentional habits with room for consistency. ‘Scrolling in bed’ reveals the extremely common phone-as-sleep-saboteur pattern. ‘Powering through’ suggests boundary issues with time and overcommitment. ‘No idea’ indicates chaotic or disordered sleep patterns. Key Body domain baseline — sleep quality cascades into mood, cognition, and physical health.\n\nFactoid extraction: If A, note their early sleep time. If B, note their intentional wind-down habits. If C, note the phone-in-bed pattern and its impact on sleep. If D, note the late-night work tendency. If E, note the lack of consistent sleep patterns.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 2,
"answers": [
{
"label": "Couldn’t tell you — I was asleep by 9:30",
"value": "A",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "Winding down with intention — phone’s away, lights are low, I’ll be out within the hour",
"value": "B",
"score": 8
},
{
"label": "In bed, but my phone and I are still having a conversation",
"value": "C",
"score": 5
},
{
"label": "Still powering through something that probably could’ve waited until morning",
"value": "D",
"score": 3
},
{
"label": "Every night is its own adventure. I genuinely don’t know.",
"value": "E",
"score": 1
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_fact_living",
"type": "freeform",
"question": "Who do you share your living space with? (Partner, kids, roommates, pets, blissful solitude — whatever applies.)",
"evalHint": "Captures household composition. Extract: who they live with, approximate household size, living arrangement type (alone/partner/family/roommates/other). Relevant for Home domain scoring context and Intimacy/Community domain framing. Not about quality — just the facts.\n\nFactoid extraction: Store each person and pet as a separate factoid. Note any split-residence or temporary living situations as separate factoids.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 1
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_gate_school",
"type": "boolean",
"question": "Are you currently a student of any kind — college, grad school, trade program, the ‘I’m going back to school at 40’ kind?",
"evalHint": "Routing question. If Yes → include school in activeDomainIds. If No → omit. The specific type of education may be surfaced by the factoid pipeline.",
"maxScore": 7,
"weight": 0,
"answers": [
{
"label": "Yes, I’m currently in school",
"value": "Y",
"score": 7
},
{
"label": "No, not at the moment",
"value": "N",
"score": 7
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_probe_emotion",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"question": "A coworker takes credit for your idea in a meeting. You notice you’re feeling…",
"evalHint": "Measures emotional granularity and self-awareness. The ‘specific cocktail’ option shows multi-layered emotional processing — high emotional literacy. ‘Angry, composing the email’ is clear but narrow emotion with action impulse. ‘Something’s off but can’t name it’ reveals limited interoceptive vocabulary. ‘Wouldn’t notice until later’ indicates delayed or absent emotional awareness. Core Mind domain skill — high granularity predicts coaching readiness and benefits from nuanced feedback.\n\nFactoid extraction: If A, note their strong emotional self-awareness and ability to hold complex feelings simultaneously. If B, note how they identify emotions clearly but default to anger. If C, note their difficulty identifying and naming feelings. If D, note their delayed emotional awareness and tendency toward physical symptoms.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 3,
"answers": [
{
"label": "A mess of things — annoyed at them, annoyed at myself for not speaking up, weirdly curious about why it stings so much",
"value": "A",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "Angry. And I’m mentally composing the email I’ll never send.",
"value": "B",
"score": 7
},
{
"label": "Something’s off, but I couldn’t name the feeling if you paid me",
"value": "C",
"score": 4
},
{
"label": "Fine, probably? I don’t usually notice that stuff until it shows up as a headache later.",
"value": "D",
"score": 1
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_gate_work_biz",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"question": "Which of these sounds most like your work life right now?",
"evalHint": "Combined routing question for Work and Business domains. If ‘employed’ → add work to activeDomainIds. If ‘employed_side’ → add BOTH work and business. If ‘self_employed’ → add business only. If ‘between’ → add work (job seekers benefit from Work domain). If ‘na’ → add neither. The specific selection also provides context for Money and Purpose domains.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 0,
"answers": [
{
"label": "I work for an organization — full-time, part-time, or contract",
"value": "employed",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "I have a day job but I’m also building something on the side",
"value": "employed_side",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "I’m self-employed, freelancing, or running my own thing",
"value": "self_employed",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "Between gigs or actively job hunting",
"value": "between",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "Not applicable — student, retired, or work isn’t in my picture right now",
"value": "na",
"score": 10
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_probe_food",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"question": "A friend cancels dinner plans last minute. You were counting on going out tonight. What’s your move?",
"evalHint": "Probes nutrition mindset and food relationship via a scenario that reveals default feeding behavior under mild disruption. ‘Throw something together’ signals a relaxed, intuitive relationship with food and resourcefulness. ‘Order delivery’ is functional and self-aware — adequate but may miss the cooking-as-self-care dimension. ‘Three apps and dietary rules’ reveals a complicated, over-controlled relationship with food, common in diet culture. ‘Cereal over the sink’ suggests disconnection from nourishment as self-care. Body domain baseline for nutrition. If ‘cereal’ option — note pattern but do not diagnose; flag for sensitive handling.\n\nFactoid extraction: If A, note their easygoing, improvisational approach to cooking. If B, note the meal-prep habit. If C, note their comfort with delivery as a fallback. If D, note their rigid relationship with food rules and dietary restrictions. If E, note how disrupted routines lead to neglected meals.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 2,
"answers": [
{
"label": "Shrug, raid the fridge, improvise. Rice, eggs, hot sauce — we call it fusion.",
"value": "A",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "No worries, I have meal prep portions waiting in the fridge.",
"value": "B",
"score": 9
},
{
"label": "Order delivery. No shame. I’ll cook this weekend. Probably.",
"value": "C",
"score": 7
},
{
"label": "I’m already on three apps trying to find something that fits my current dietary rules.",
"value": "D",
"score": 4
},
{
"label": "This is how I end up eating cereal standing over the sink at 9 PM.",
"value": "E",
"score": 1
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_fact_formative",
"type": "freeform",
"question": "Tell us about one experience from your past that left a mark — something that shaped who you are today, for better or worse.",
"evalHint": "Surfaces formative narrative and meaning-making capacity. Extract: the experience itself, which life domain(s) it maps to, whether the user frames it as growth or unresolved wound, and any lasting beliefs or patterns it created. High meaning-making (‘it taught me X’) suggests coaching readiness. Raw or unprocessed framing suggests areas requiring a gentle approach. Store the experience and its domain relevance as durable factoids.\n\nFactoid extraction: Store the experience and its lasting impact as separate factoids.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 1
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_probe_stress",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"question": "You get an email: your flight tomorrow has been canceled. No rebookings available for two days. What happens in the first 30 seconds?",
"evalHint": "Probes stress response regulation and distress tolerance using a universally stressful scenario (independent of financial situation). ‘Deep breath, problem-solving’ shows pause-and-respond capacity — high emotional regulation. ‘Heart rate spikes but already on the phone’ shows physiological activation with functional coping. ‘Call someone to talk it through’ reveals co-regulation as primary coping style — functional and socially connected, but dependent on external support for processing. Cross-reference with fact_support to assess whether their support network can sustain this pattern. ‘Cycle through worst-case scenarios’ reveals cognitive flooding and catastrophizing tendency. ‘Close the email’ shows avoidance coping style. Relevant to Mind (emotional regulation) and general stress tolerance baseline.\n\nFactoid extraction: If A, note their calm, pause-and-respond stress regulation. If B, note how stress hits them physically but they still act quickly. If C, note their need to co-regulate by talking things through with someone. If D, note the catastrophizing tendency under pressure. If E, note the avoidance coping pattern.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 3,
"answers": [
{
"label": "Deep breath. Annoying, but there’s always another way. I start problem-solving.",
"value": "A",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "My heart rate spikes, but I’m already on the phone with the airline before the panic fully lands.",
"value": "B",
"score": 8
},
{
"label": "I immediately call someone — my partner, my mom, whoever. I need to talk this through out loud before I can think straight.",
"value": "C",
"score": 6
},
{
"label": "I cycle through every worst-case scenario in my head before doing anything useful.",
"value": "D",
"score": 3
},
{
"label": "I close the email and pretend I didn’t see it. Future me can deal with this.",
"value": "E",
"score": 1
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_gate_parent",
"type": "boolean",
"question": "Are you responsible for raising a tiny (or larger) human — or expecting one soon?",
"evalHint": "Routing question. If Yes → include parenting in activeDomainIds. Covers parents, guardians, and expecting parents. If No → omit.",
"maxScore": 7,
"weight": 0,
"answers": [
{
"label": "Yes, I’m a parent, guardian, or expecting",
"value": "Y",
"score": 7
},
{
"label": "No, not at the moment",
"value": "N",
"score": 7
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_mot_why_here",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"question": "What nudged you through Uvilo’s door today?",
"evalHint": "Captures motivation type and activation energy. ‘Something specific happened’ suggests high readiness — coach can leverage the catalyst as momentum. ‘Spreadsheet tracking half my life’ reveals a systematic, data-oriented personality — high self-awareness, likely impatient with vague coaching, responds well to metrics, structure, and measurable progress. Coach with data and frameworks, not feelings-first. ‘Something’s been off’ suggests accumulated dissatisfaction — coach should help identify a focal point. ‘Curious more than anything’ signals openness but low urgency — keep early sessions light and value-demonstrating. ‘Someone recommended it’ is neutral on readiness — explore their own reasons in early coaching.\n\nFactoid extraction: If 'catalyst', note what brought them (a specific event driving change). If 'optimizer', note their data-oriented personality and any self-tracking habits. If 'drift', note the accumulated sense that something needs to change. If 'curious', note their exploratory, low-urgency entry point. If 'referred', note that someone else pointed them here.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 1,
"answers": [
{
"label": "Something specific happened, and I’m ready to make changes",
"value": "catalyst",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "I already have spreadsheets and gadgets tracking half my life. I’ve been looking for something like this.",
"value": "optimizer",
"score": 8
},
{
"label": "I’ve been feeling like something’s off for a while — time to figure it out",
"value": "drift",
"score": 6
},
{
"label": "Curious more than anything — let’s see what this is about",
"value": "curious",
"score": 4
},
{
"label": "Someone recommended it, so here I am",
"value": "referred",
"score": 2
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_fact_transitions",
"type": "freeform",
"question": "Are you in the middle of any major life transitions right now? New job, move, breakup, new baby, loss, career change, retirement — anything that’s reshaping your day-to-day.",
"evalHint": "Captures active life transitions. Extract: what transitions are happening, which domains they affect, the user’s implied emotional state about them, and whether transitions are chosen or forced. Multiple simultaneous transitions suggest high cognitive load — coach should triage carefully. ‘None’ isn’t bad — it may indicate stability or stagnation depending on context. Store each transition and its affected domain(s) as durable factoids.\n\nFactoid extraction: Store each transition as a separate factoid (e.g., relocation, career change, relationship change, housing plan). Note whether each transition is chosen or forced.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 1
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_probe_friend",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"question": "A friend you haven’t heard from in months calls out of the blue, clearly upset. You…",
"evalHint": "Probes active listening vs. fix-it mode and relational availability. ‘Listen first, follow their lead’ indicates strong empathic listening and attunement. ‘Listen then offer suggestions’ reveals well-intentioned but premature problem-solving (very common pattern). ‘Awkward but try’ suggests social discomfort or underdeveloped relational skills. ‘Voicemail, text later’ may indicate healthy boundary-setting or social withdrawal — cross-reference with fact_support answer to disambiguate. Community domain baseline.\n\nFactoid extraction: If A, note their empathic listening ability. If B, note their tendency to jump to fixing rather than just listening. If C, note their discomfort with emotional support situations. If D, note the tendency to withdraw when others need support.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 2,
"answers": [
{
"label": "Pick up. Listen. Ask what they need. Follow their lead.",
"value": "A",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "Listen for a bit, then start brainstorming fixes. That’s how I show love.",
"value": "B",
"score": 7
},
{
"label": "Feel a little out of my depth, but show up and do my best.",
"value": "C",
"score": 4
},
{
"label": "Let it go to voicemail. I’ll text later when I’ve got bandwidth.",
"value": "D",
"score": 1
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_gate_care",
"type": "boolean",
"question": "Beyond pets and houseplants — are you regularly looking after someone who depends on your care (an aging parent, a family member with a disability?)",
"evalHint": "Routing question. If Yes → include caregiving in activeDomainIds. Covers: aging parents, disabled family members, chronically ill loved ones, and other dependent adults. If No → omit.",
"maxScore": 7,
"weight": 0,
"answers": [
{
"label": "Yes, I’m a caregiver for someone",
"value": "Y",
"score": 7
},
{
"label": "No, I don’t have that role right now",
"value": "N",
"score": 7
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_probe_rest",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"question": "Saturday afternoon. Nothing on the calendar. You could just… do nothing. How does that feel?",
"evalHint": "Probes permission to rest and productivity guilt. ‘Delicious’ signals a healthy relationship with unstructured time and rest. ‘Nice in theory’ reveals mild guilt or identity-through-output patterns. ‘Uncomfortable’ is a common burnout precursor — rest feels threatening to self-worth. ‘Can’t remember’ suggests chronic overcommitment or avoidance of stillness. Key Play domain signal — also relevant to Mind (stress) and Body (recovery).\n\nFactoid extraction: If A, note their comfort with unstructured downtime. If B, note the mild tension between rest and productivity. If C, note how rest triggers guilt quickly. If D, note chronic overcommitment and difficulty finding downtime.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 2,
"answers": [
{
"label": "Delicious. I know how to do nothing and I’m excellent at it.",
"value": "A",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "Nice in theory, though I’d probably find something ‘productive’ to do after a while.",
"value": "B",
"score": 7
},
{
"label": "Uncomfortable. If I’m not doing something useful, the guilt shows up fast.",
"value": "C",
"score": 4
},
{
"label": "I can’t remember the last time I had nothing on the calendar. Is that a trick question?",
"value": "D",
"score": 1
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_fact_support",
"type": "freeform",
"question": "Who are the 2–3 people you’d call at 2 AM if everything went sideways?",
"evalHint": "Captures support network quality and availability. Extract: who their closest supports are, the nature of those relationships (family, friends, partner, professional), and whether the network feels robust or thin. Naming specific people suggests an established trust network. Hesitation, ‘no one,’ or naming only one person is a critical signal for isolation — high priority for Community domain. Store named relationships and their types as durable factoids.\n\nFactoid extraction: Store each named person as a separate factoid describing them as a close support (e.g., \u201cPatti is one of Erik\u2019s closest supports\u201d). Use present tense, not conditional (\u201cwould call\u201d).",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 1
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_probe_conflict",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"question": "You and someone close to you disagree about something that matters. Your natural instinct is to…",
"evalHint": "Probes conflict style and communication patterns in close relationships. ‘Name it directly, stay curious’ indicates healthy assertive communication. ‘Find compromise, give ground’ is functional but may signal people-pleasing at higher frequency. ‘Match their energy, regret it, circle back’ reveals a reactive-then-repair pattern — the self-awareness is there but impulse regulation lags behind. Coach needs to work on the pause between feeling and response. ‘Let it cool off first’ suggests conflict anxiety or avoidance with intention to return — functional if they actually follow through. ‘Go along to keep peace’ is a marker for boundary issues. This pattern shows up regardless of relationship status — applies to any close relationship. Relevant to Intimacy and Community domains.\n\nFactoid extraction: If A, note their direct, curiosity-driven conflict style. If B, note the compromising tendency and whether it edges into people-pleasing. If C, note the react-then-repair pattern. If D, note the cooling-off approach and whether they follow through afterward. If E, note the peace-keeping pattern and possible boundary issues.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 2,
"answers": [
{
"label": "Name the disagreement directly and stay curious about where they’re coming from",
"value": "A",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "Look for the compromise, even if I have to give some ground to get there",
"value": "B",
"score": 8
},
{
"label": "Match their energy first, regret it 20 minutes later, then circle back calmer with an apology",
"value": "C",
"score": 5
},
{
"label": "Let it cool off first. I’ll bring it up when we’re both calmer.",
"value": "D",
"score": 3
},
{
"label": "Honestly? I’d probably just go along with them to keep the peace.",
"value": "E",
"score": 1
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_probe_growth",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"question": "You try something new and you completely bomb. What’s the story you tell yourself afterward?",
"evalHint": "Probes growth vs. fixed mindset through self-talk after failure. ‘Humbling, what can I learn’ indicates growth mindset and healthy humility. ‘Not great but I’ll adjust’ shows persistence with mild self-protection. ‘Maybe not for me’ suggests talent attribution over effort attribution (fixed mindset signal). ‘Knew I shouldn’t have tried’ indicates broader self-criticism pattern and may connect to Mind domain self-talk work. Growth domain baseline.\n\nFactoid extraction: If A, note their growth-oriented response to failure. If B, note their persistence alongside self-protective tendencies after setbacks. If C, note the fixed-mindset lean (‘not for me’ attribution). If D, note the self-critical pattern after failure.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 2,
"answers": [
{
"label": "“Well, that was humbling. What can I take from this?”",
"value": "A",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "“Not my finest hour, but at least I showed up. I’ll adjust.”",
"value": "B",
"score": 7
},
{
"label": "“Maybe this just isn’t for me. Some people have it and some don’t.”",
"value": "C",
"score": 4
},
{
"label": "“I knew I shouldn’t have tried. Classic me.”",
"value": "D",
"score": 1
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_fact_evening",
"type": "freeform",
"question": "Paint us a picture: what does a typical weekday evening look like for you, from the time you get home to the time your head hits the pillow?",
"evalHint": "Captures daily routine structure and lifestyle context. Extract: exercise habits, social time, screen time, cooking vs. takeout, alone time vs. family time, wind-down routine (or lack thereof), and any recurring patterns. The level of detail and tone reveals self-awareness and relationship with daily structure. Look for signals of: burnout (collapse on couch), balance (varied activities), isolation (no mention of others), overcommitment (no downtime). Cross-reference with probe_sleep and fact_living for a full picture. Multiple domain signals in one answer.\n\nFactoid extraction: Store each routine element as a separate factoid (e.g., work-from-home status, dinner habits, evening activities, sleep routine).",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 1
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_probe_move",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"question": "Your friend invites you to try their new gym class tomorrow morning at 7 AM. What’s your honest reaction?",
"evalHint": "Probes relationship with physical movement and intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation via a concrete scenario. ‘Already setting my alarm’ signals intrinsic enjoyment of movement — coach can build on existing momentum. ‘I’ll go, don’t talk to me’ shows compliance without enthusiasm — functional but fragile under stress. ‘Say maybe, pray they forget’ reveals avoidance and disconnection from movement. ‘Laugh so hard’ suggests exercise is so far from their identity it’s absurd — start with micro-movement, not gym culture. Body domain baseline — also reveals general attitude toward self-care discipline.\n\nFactoid extraction: If A, note their enthusiasm for movement and trying new physical activities. If B, note that they show up for exercise but without intrinsic motivation. If C, note the avoidance pattern around exercise commitments. If D, note their deep disconnection from physical activity.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 2,
"answers": [
{
"label": "Already setting my alarm. I love trying new ways to move.",
"value": "A",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "I’ll go, but silently. Don’t make me talk to anyone before 8 AM.",
"value": "B",
"score": 7
},
{
"label": "I say ‘maybe!’ and quietly pray they forget to follow up.",
"value": "C",
"score": 4
},
{
"label": "I laugh so hard I almost choke on my coffee.",
"value": "D",
"score": 1
}
]
},
{
"handle": "onb_general_probe_money",
"type": "multiple_choice",
"question": "You find $5,000 in an envelope with your name on it. What’s your first move?",
"evalHint": "Probes financial hierarchy awareness and money mindset. ‘Savings or investments’ signals long-term financial thinking and security. ‘Pay down debt’ shows awareness with practical prioritization. ‘Cover bills’ suggests financial stress and survival-mode thinking. ‘Spend it fast’ suggests avoidance or low financial self-regulation. Not a judgment — each reveals where Money domain coaching should start.\n\nFactoid extraction: If A, note their long-term financial thinking. If B, note their debt-aware prioritization. If C, note current financial stress and bill pressure. If D, note the impulsive spending tendency.",
"maxScore": 10,
"weight": 2,
"answers": [
{
"label": "Straight to savings or investments — future me will thank present me",
"value": "A",
"score": 10
},
{
"label": "Pay down some debt, then maybe save the rest",
"value": "B",
"score": 7
},
{
"label": "Cover some bills that have been quietly stressing me out",
"value": "C",
"score": 4Note: This file exceeds 500 lines. Showing the first 500 lines. View the complete file on GitHub