Knowledge Consistency Plan Eval 8
Project: Forge/Knowledge_Consistency
Phase Evaluated: Plan_Eval_8
Plan Documents Evaluated: Knowledge_Consistency_Plan_1.md through Knowledge_Consistency_Plan_8.md
Primary Plan 8 Work Product: Forge/Projects/Knowledge_Consistency/Knowledge_Consistency_Plan_8.md
Evaluator Role: Project Evaluator
Evaluation Skill: project-plan-eval
Run Date: 2026-07-29
Plan Eval 8 Verdict
Approved after auto-fix convergence.
Plan 8 had two mechanical task-quality defects during the initial review. Project Thinker auto-fixed both in commit 56f1cd2, the plan was re-evaluated, and all checklist items now pass.
Plan Eval 8 Checklist
| # | Criterion | Result | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Self-contained | ✅ | Plan 8 names every target file, includes current/new replacement snippets, and provides verification commands. |
| 2 | Procedural, not declarative | ✅ | Tasks give ordered edit steps and verification commands rather than only target-state descriptions. |
| 3 | Single session | ✅ | The scope is a focused stale-reference cleanup across 10 named files, followed by build/commit/push. |
| 4 | Spec coverage | ✅ | Plans 1-7 already cover the approved Spec matrix; Plan 8 adds post-Verify coverage for stale references mapped to S1.3, S1.5, S1.6, S1.8, S1.10, S4.4, and S7.2-S7.3. |
| 5 | No gaps or overlaps | ✅ | Plan 8 addresses E2-E10: E2-E8 through Tasks 1-6, E9 as already resolved, and E10 through the comprehensive Plan 8 scope. Re-edits to prior files are post-Verify corrections, not redundant overlap. |
| 6 | Ordered | ✅ | Independent file-edit tasks precede the build/commit/push task; there are no forward references. |
| 7 | Task quality | ✅ | After auto-fix, every task has a Spec context quote or Spec-section context and actionable steps. |
| 8 | No checkboxes | ✅ | No plan-state checkboxes appear outside code fences. Checkbox snippets occur only inside quoted target-file examples. |
| 9 | Planning scope rule | ✅ | This is an implementation plan and may direct edits to explicitly named implementation files. |
| 10 | Testable output | ✅ | Each task has grep-style verification, and Task 7 verifies build plus git commit/push. The Task 1 grep false-positive was auto-fixed. |
| 11 | File structure | ✅ | The project has sequential Knowledge_Consistency_Plan_1.md through Knowledge_Consistency_Plan_8.md, exactly one Plan per file. No combined bare Knowledge_Consistency_Plan.md is present. |
Plan Eval 8 Items
| # | Type | Description | Status | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PE8-1 | Defect | Task 1’s verification command used grep -n 'list_skills|find_skill|get_skill_details', which would false-positive on the desired forge-discovery__list_skills value. | 🟢 Resolved | Fix |
| PE8-2 | Defect | Task 7’s context quote block did not reference Spec sections, contrary to the Plan Eval task-quality checklist. | 🟢 Resolved | Fix |
Plan Eval 8 Resolution Log
| # | Disposition | Action taken | Resolved |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE8-1 | Fix | Project Thinker replaced the Task 1 verification command with `grep -nP ’(?<!forge-discovery__)(list_skills | find_skill |
| PE8-2 | Fix | Project Thinker added a Spec-section context quote to Task 7 covering S1.3, S1.5, S1.6, S1.8, S1.10, S4.4, and S7.2-S7.3. Commit: 56f1cd2. | Yes |
Plan Eval 8 Run / Cost Evidence
Exact token and cost evidence is unavailable in this session. Available evidence:
- Current phase at evaluation start:
Plan_Eval_8_Started. - Evaluation skill loaded via
forge-discovery__get_skill:project-plan-eval. - Auto-fix sub-agent conversation:
cnv_cms6d6gv4002001odd8vy09t0. - Auto-fix commit pushed to
dev:56f1cd2. - Auto-fix build evidence reported by Project Thinker:
npm run build --prefix .internalsucceeded with 942 pages. - Local re-evaluation script confirmed sequential plan files 1-8, no outside-fence checkboxes, and no tasks missing Spec context quotes after auto-fix.
- Final evaluator build succeeded with 942 pages and report/phase commit
a11986ewas pushed todev. - Human gate todo created:
tdi_cms6dh53y002q01od9l3kr6zmon user todo listtdl_cmqjm0ui6000922uyc5yj6o9w.
Plan Eval 8 Next Step
Plan_Eval is listed in human_gates, so this approval requires the G4 human gate before execution. Human gate todo: tdi_cms6dh53y002q01od9l3kr6zm. If approved, route to Project Worker for Execute Plan 8. If changes are requested, return to Plan 8 revision.
Previous Plan Eval History
Knowledge Consistency Plan Eval 1 (Prior History)
Project: Forge/Knowledge_Consistency
Phase Evaluated: Plan_Eval
Plan Document: Forge/Projects/Knowledge_Consistency/Knowledge_Consistency_Plan.md
Evaluator Role: Project Evaluator
Evaluation Skill: project-plan-eval
Run Date: 2026-07-19
Verdict
Rejected — auto-fix required before Plan_Eval can pass.
Checklist
| # | Criterion | Result | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Self-contained | ⚠️ | Several tasks require implementers to discover unspecified targets (likely Forge/sidebar.ts or similar, non-exhaustive file lists), and key Spec targets are not named at all. |
| 2 | Procedural, not declarative | ✅ | Most tasks give concrete edit/create steps rather than only target-state descriptions. |
| 3 | Single session | ⚠️ | Plan 3 is already broad, and the missing Spec targets require enough additional skill, prompt, and documentation work that the Plan set should be repartitioned. |
| 4 | Spec coverage | ⚠️ | The Plan set does not cover multiple approved Spec sections, especially skills, Bot prompts, Persistent Knowledge prompt updates, and follow-up todos. |
| 5 | No gaps or overlaps | ⚠️ | Major coverage gaps exist; overlaps are not the primary issue. |
| 6 | Ordered | ⚠️ | Plan 3 Task 11 can eliminate Forge/README.md before Task 12 attempts to edit it. Plan ordering otherwise correctly makes Plan 1 prerequisite to Plans 2 and 3. |
| 7 | Task quality | ⚠️ | Several tasks lack exact target paths, complete file lists, or a context quote block referencing the Spec. |
| 8 | No checkboxes | ⚠️ | The Plan document contains unchecked completion-criteria checkboxes. Completion criteria must not use checkboxes; those belong in Execute_State. |
| 9 | Planning scope rule | ✅ | The Plan is an implementation plan and may direct edits to explicitly named implementation files. |
| 10 | Testable output | ⚠️ | Many file-edit tasks include grep-style checks, but missing prompt/todo work cannot be verified because it is absent from the Plan. npm run build failure due to missing package script is a known infrastructure issue and is not counted as a Plan content defect. |
Items
| # | Type | Description | Status | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Gap | Spec coverage is incomplete. Missing or incomplete coverage includes S1.1 Orchestration → Agentic_Prompts, S1.2 Update_Infrastructure, S1.3 skill references to Forge_Chat_Prompt.md, S1.4 LibreChat references in MCP skills, S1.5 path fixes in four skills beyond Forge_Setup.md, S1.8 MongoDB removal, S1.9 MCP references/available-skills handling, S1.10 affected skills and Bot prompts, S3.1 Project Runner prompt alignment, S3.2-S3.4 Bot prompt fixes/publication, S5 Available Skills prompt updates, S7.3 skill model-reference cleanup, S9 handoff/run-cost evidence consistency, S11 follow-up todos, and S12 Project_Flow/Runner prompt Pending-state cleanup. | 🔴 Open | Update plan |
| E2 | Defect | The Plan claims Plan 1 covers S1.1, S1.2, and S11.1, but Plan 1 tasks do not implement those Spec sections. S11.1 in the Spec is the git-changes artifact follow-up todo, not phase-state guidance. | 🔴 Open | Update plan |
| E3 | Defect | Some target paths are wrong or ambiguous. Forge/Forge_Project/Projects/Admin_Panel/Admin_Panel_Plan.md conflicts with the Spec’s Forge/Output/Admin_Panel_Plan.md; Plan 2 says the sidebar file is “likely” Forge/sidebar.ts; Plan 3 Task 2 uses a non-exhaustive file list. | 🔴 Open | Update plan |
| E4 | Defect | The Plan contains completion-criteria checkboxes (- [ ] ...). The Plan Eval skill forbids checkboxes in Plans because Execute_State owns checklist state. | 🔴 Open | Update plan |
| E5 | Defect | Several tasks lack a context quote block referencing the Spec section, especially build/commit tasks. The Plan Eval checklist requires every task to include a context quote block referencing the Spec section. | 🔴 Open | Update plan |
| E6 | Defect | Plan ordering has an internal conflict: Plan 3 Task 11 may eliminate Forge/README.md, while Task 12 later requires editing Forge/README.md. | 🔴 Open | Update plan |
| E7 | Gap | Plan 3 is too broad once missing skill, Bot prompt, Persistent Knowledge prompt, and follow-up-todo work is added. The Plan set should be repartitioned into single-session implementation plans with independently testable outputs. | 🔴 Open | Update plan |
| E8 | Defect | Some verification criteria are not self-contained enough for execution, including “all knowledge files” without a complete target list and README/AGENTS consolidation without a required output record. | 🔴 Open | Update plan |
Resolution Log
| # | Disposition | Action taken | Resolved |
|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Update plan | Added Spec Coverage Matrix to Overview mapping every Spec section to Plan and Task; repartitioned into 7 Plans covering all Spec sections. | Yes |
| E2 | Update plan | Corrected Plan 1 Spec coverage claim to S7.1 and S7.3 only; S11.1 moved to Plan 7 Task 8 as a follow-up todo, not phase-state guidance. | Yes |
| E3 | Update plan | Replaced all ambiguous paths with verified paths: Admin_Panel_Plan.md at Forge/Output/, no sidebar.ts file (Page Manager via spawnAgent), explicit 14-file and 16-file lists. | Yes |
| E4 | Update plan | Removed all completion-criteria checkboxes; replaced with plain prose completion criteria. | Yes |
| E5 | Update plan | Added context quote block (> Spec …) to every task including build/commit/push tasks. | Yes |
| E6 | Update plan | Reordered Plan 6: Task 4 (S1.10 doc edits) executes before Task 5 (S10.1 README/AGENTS consolidation); added explicit ordering note. | Yes |
| E7 | Update plan | Repartitioned from 5 Plans to 7 Plans, each scoped to a single artifact type and single-session implementable. | Yes |
| E8 | Update plan | Made all file lists explicit and complete (14 skill files, 16 knowledge files); added required output record for S10.1 consolidation to Knowledge_Consistency_README_Consolidation.md. | Yes |
Run / Cost Evidence
Exact token and cost evidence is unavailable in this session. Available evidence:
- Project discovery returned phase
Plan_1_Completedbefore evaluation. - Phase was set to
Plan_Eval_StartedinKnowledge_Consistency_Phase.md. npm run buildwas attempted from/workspace/erik@uvilo.com/uvilo-osand failed withMissing script: "build"; this is a known issue recorded by the user and is not a Plan content defect.- Phase-start commit created:
aa3487c(Start Knowledge Consistency Plan Eval) and pushed todev.
Next Step
Project Thinker should revise Knowledge_Consistency_Plan.md to resolve E1-E8, then return for Plan_Eval re-evaluation. No human decision is required at this stage because the findings are mechanical coverage, ordering, and task-quality defects with clear Spec-based corrections.