Project Automation Eval 9

Evaluation of Plan 9 implementation.

---

Run — 2026-07-16

Verdict

Rejected — 2 items to fix

Implementation Summary

Task	Status	Notes
Task 1 — Write the guide at its permanent Forge location	🚫	Guide created with all 7 sections; contains 2 defects
Task 2 — Add the sidebar entry for the guide	✅	Sidebar entry added correctly
Task 3 — Build, commit, push	✅	Build passes (872 pages, 0 errors)

Items

#	Type	Description	Status	Disposition
E1	Defect	Section 3 → Eval → Your involvement incorrectly describes the “Reject” disposition as “major issues require a new Plan”. The actual Eval skill defines “reject” as “Item → 🟢 Resolved (no action)”. This factual error would mislead human readers about what reject means.	🟢 Resolved	Fix
E2	Defect	Section 6 → Persisted Evaluation Reports table includes {Project}_Audit_Results.md with phase “Audit”, but the lifecycle in Section 1 has no Audit phase. This is an internal inconsistency — the guide describes a phase that doesn’t exist in its own lifecycle.	🟢 Resolved	Fix

Resolution Log

#	Disposition	Action taken	Resolved
E1	Fix	See Run 2026-07-17	✅
E2	Fix	Removed Audit row from table	✅

Notes

The guide is well-structured and comprehensive overall. The 7 required sections are all present and substantive. The two defects are factual errors in the content rather than structural issues — once corrected, the guide should pass eval cleanly.

---

Run — 2026-07-17

Verdict

Approved

Implementation Summary

Task	Status	Notes
Task 1 — Write the guide at its permanent Forge location	✅	Guide created with all 7 sections
Task 2 — Add the sidebar entry for the guide	✅	Sidebar entry added correctly
Task 3 — Build, commit, push	✅	Build passes, pushed to dev
E1 — Fix the Reject disposition description	🚫	First fix changed wording but meaning still wrong — see E1a
E2 — Remove Audit row from Persisted Evaluation Reports table	✅	Audit row removed; table now consistent with lifecycle
E1a — Fix disposition descriptions with correct definitions	✅	All four dispositions updated to user’s intended meanings across guide, Eval skill, Extract Eval skill, Verify skill, and Forge Project Flow

Items

#	Type	Description	Status	Disposition
E1a	Defect	Section 3 → Eval: all four disposition descriptions were incorrect or imprecise. User provided the correct definitions: Fix = fix the finding, Update = don’t fix the implementation; update the Spec instead, Reject = I disagree; do nothing, Defer = move to a later Plan.	🟢 Resolved	Fix

Resolution Log

#	Disposition	Action taken	Resolved
E1a	Fix	Updated all four disposition descriptions in guide + synced across 4 additional docs (Eval skill, Extract Eval skill, Verify skill, Forge Project Flow §8.1 and §8.2)	✅

Notes

E2 confirmed fixed. E1 required two passes — the first fix only reworded Reject but kept the wrong meaning; the second fix applied the user’s intended definitions for all four dispositions and propagated them to every doc that defines them. The scope expanded beyond the guide because the same incorrect definitions existed in the Eval skill, Extract Eval skill, Verify skill, and Forge Project Flow.